Wednesday, June 9, 2021

“Duelo a jamónes”



FRANCISCO GOYA’S body of work can be viewed as one man’s journey across the enlightenment, from its dawn to its dusk, from the rise of its hopes to sinking into its darkness: the painter began his long career as a believer of enlightenment, yearning that it would bring a change to Spanish society (this can be observed in his early paintings which depicted his society in bright colours and cheerful atmospheres) and ended up being disillusioned by it. This sentiment was not without reason, it was gradually developed by continuously seeing the Spanish government—the nobilities—going further and further away from the enlightenment promises that he had once believed, coupled with the horror of the Napolenoic war which occurred during his lifetime[1]. His final works, a dark and disturbing collection of paintings called Pinturas negras, or Black Paintings, were the apotheosis of his disappointment with enlightenment, and humanity in general. The fourteen paintings were created between 1819 and 1823, after Goya had resigned from his duty as a court painter and decided to reside in a house outside Madrid that was called Quinta del Sordo (Deaf Man’s Villa); he made them on the walls of this house[2]. The most famous work from these mural paintings is perhaps the terrifying Saturn Devouring His Son (Saturno devorando a su hijo); another one that is, unfortunately, less famous but no less interesting is the painting Fight with Cudgels (Duelo a garrotazos).

 

Fight with Cudgels (Duelo a garrotazos), Francisco Goya, 1820–1823

 

Fight with Cudgels is an oil mural—which later transferred to canvas upon the death of the painter—depicting two men fighting one another with cudgels; some scholars noted that this seems to be an allusion to Spanish Civil War[3]. It’s a landscape painting with two figures: the men are in the foreground, but positioned a bit on the left side of the painting instead of the centre, allowing us to observe the nature of the landscape in which the fight took place. Various shades of blue, brown, and green dominate this painting, contributing to creating a depressive, desolate atmosphere. Meanwhile, the two figures are predominantly black and white, and on the face of one of them, there are small red patches that indicate drips of blood: evidence that their fight is serious, a fight to the death. White is also visible in one part of the sky, showing the source of light in the painting, which we could assume is the sun setting on the horizon (at the centre part of the painting, behind the figure on the right, or serving as the backlight of the fight scene): this could also be read as a sign that the two men have been fighting endlessly long and still not finished (or about to finish) by the end of the day. One interesting aspect of this painting is that the bottom to the knees of the two men are somehow missing: creates the impression or illusion that the two of them are either fighting on their knees that are sucked in some kind of mud (or quagmire). This mud interpretation has actually been refuted by several scholars by examining the photo of the mural before being transferred to the canvas (photographed by Jean Laurent, around 1874), and it was seen that the legs of the two men were completely painted, and the landscape of the painting was a grass field and not mud; it’s believed that the failure of the transfer that has caused the damage on large areas of the painting, including the legs of the two men. However, one could argue that the final detail emphasizes the interpretation of the never-ending fight to the death: that the two men’s legs are buried in the ground, and they couldn’t move anywhere: they have no other choice but to fight to the death, and whoever comes out as the victor, he will still be trapped.

The first thing we can associate with the fight in this painting is war. Through Goya’s previous works—for example, The Disasters of War (Los desastres de la guerra), a series of 82 prints he created between 1810 and 1820, or the famous painting The Third of May 1808 (El tres de mayo de 1808 en Madrid, 1814)—we know how he viewed war, we know he experienced the horror of war in his country. In this painting, war, or human conflict in general, appears symbolically, represented by the two men fighting. And from the details and the atmosphere of the paintings, we can conclude that all those conflicts carry out by humans will only end up damaging nature.

 

Jamón Jamón, Bigas Luna, 1992

 

About 160 years after the death of Goya, Bigas Luna, the famous Spanish director, released a film called Jamón Jamón (or Ham Ham in English). His films are known for their eroticism and its connection to food, and this one is no different. The film tells a love triangle between Silvia (Penélope Cruz), Raúl Gonzales (Javier Bardem), and José Luis (Jordi Mollà). Silvia works sewing men’s underwear, José Luis is the son of the underwear factory owners, and Raúl Gonzales is an aspiring bullfighter, a part-time underwear model, as well as a part-time worker in a ham warehouse; hence the film’s title. Many things happen throughout the duration of the film—Silvia is pregnant, José Luis is committed to marrying Silvia, José Luis’s mother rejects her (because her mother is a prostitute), Jose Luis’s mother hires Raúl Gonzales to seduce Silvia, Raúl Gonzales is genuinely smitten by Silvia, Jose Luis’s mother is gradually smitten by Raúl Gonzales—all this leads up to the final climax: the fight between Raúl Gonzales and José Luis. José Luis, furious to find his mother making love to Raúl Gonzales (who has also tried to seduce the woman he loves) in the ham warehouse, immediately grabs a ham to attack. Provoked, Raúl Gonzales also seized a club of ham as a weapon. The two men attacked each other until they came out of the warehouse, and the fight continued in an arid desert landscape. The composition of this scene will remind us of Goya’s painting that we have talked about at length before: instead of cudgels, the two men fight with hams, and although the clothes they wear are not exactly the same as the two figures in the painting, their gestures and their position on the screen are arguably similar. Raúl Gonzales, who is the more classically macho and whom the audience would probably assume the more physically stronger between the two, is placed on the right, and José Luis, whose nose is covered with blood, is on the left, corresponding to the original composition of Fighting with Cudgels. And regarding the positioning of the two men’s legs, the director prefers to make them fight kneeling; this choice is logical and practical for the film, rather than, for example, choosing to have both men’s legs buried in the ground. This climax resulted in the death of José Luis and Raúl Gonzales being badly wounded. All parties involved in this complicated melodrama weeps, drowning in remorse, but all is too late.

We may argue that the use of Fight with Cudgel’s composition in Jamón Jamón has reduced the painting’s interpretation to a soap opera-style romance. But then we need to remember that history and literature have recorded many conflicts, wars and massacres that occurred solely because of love and jealousy: The Trojan War took place because the king of Sparta was furious for his wife had run off with Paris, the war between Rama and Ravana in Ramayana was fought over Sita, and one of the reasons, and perhaps the most crucial one, for the battle of Mahabharata was the disrobing of Drupadi by Kaurava; in short, we humans may have experienced enlightenment, but we’re still humans, and just as humans can fight and kill each other out of glory and power, humans can do so cruelly too out of love and jealousy.

 



[1] Voorhies, James. “Francisco de Goya (1746–1828) and the Spanish Enlightenment,” The Met: Heilbrunn Timeline of Art History, October 2003. Accessed December 18, 2020 from https://www.metmuseum.org/TOAH/HD/goya/hd_goya.htm#:~:text=Goya%20came%20to%20artistic%20maturity%20during%20this%20age,joined%20their%20studio%2C%20eventually%20marrying%20their%20sister%20Josefa.

[2] Phelan, Stephen. “Goya's Black Paintings: ‘Some people can hardly even look at them’,” The Guardian, 30 January 2019. Accessed December 18, 2020 from https://www.theguardian.com/artanddesign/2019/jan/30/goya-black-paintings-prado-madrid-bicentennial-exhibition

[3] Anonym. “Fight with Cudgels, 1820 by Francisco Goya,” franciscogoya.com, n.d. Accessed December 17, 2020 from https://www.franciscogoya.com/fight-with-cudgels.jsp


Sunday, October 14, 2018

Quand vous êtes invite à un diner chez un indonésien ….

(Tugas menulis esai kecil-kecilan dari kelas bahasa Perancis.)


SI VOUS NE VOULEZ PAS être maladroit ou impoli lorsque vous être invité chez un indonésien, voici des règles aux quelles vous devriez faire attention à:
D’abord, vous pouvez venir un peu retard mais pas trop tard. Il ne faut pas venir trop tôt non plus; les indonésiens trouvaient bizzare si vous veniez, par exemple, une heure plus tôt.
Ce n’est pas une obligation d’apporter quelque chose pour le dîner. Mais, si vous voulez, vous ne devrez pas apporter d’alcool; il serait préférable d’apporter des fruits ou un gâteau. Vous ne devez pas pas porter vos chaussures ou vos sandales à l’intérieur de la maison: ce serait impoli. Les indonésiens marchent pieds nus dans la maison.
Attention à la salutation, surtout entre sexes opposés ! Vous devriez connaître les hôtes. Si vos hôtes sont musulmans, vous ne devez pas serrer la main à vos sexes opposes, vous devrez joinder les mains et s’incliner. Si les hôtes musulmans sont modérés ou libéraux, peut-être vous pouvez serer la main des sexes opposés. Mais la religion n’est pas toujours le cas: à Bali, par exemple, on est hindou et on n’a aucun problème à toucher la main du sexe oppose, mais on salue en rassemnblant les mains et en s’inclinant. Une autre chose à marquer: les indonésiens toucheront leur cœur après avoir serré la main. Les étrangers peuvent confondre le geste avec le nettoyage de la main après avoir touché la main de l’autre. Mais le geste signifies implement mettre votre salutation dans le cœur. Donc, si vous n’êtes pas sûr de comment saluer, vous pouvez attendre que l’autre personne fasse le premier geste, puis répondre.

Quand ma mère avait une vingtaine d’années

(Tugas menulis esai kecil-kecilan dari kelas bahasa Perancis.)


AVANT QUE ma mère ne se transforme en femme en hijab comme beaucoup de femmes indonésiennes aujourd’hui, elle était une jeune femme forte et volontaire. Bien sûr, elle ne portait pas le hijab, elle avait de beaux cheveux noirs mi-longs. Ses cheveux étaient frisés aussi, mais pas naurellement; les femmes indonésiennes aimaient avoir les cheveux frisés à cette époque. Je me souviens de l’avoir vue dans un blazer avec des épaulettes sur l’une de ses vieilles photos. Je pense qu’elle était dans ses première années de travail en tant que juge local sur la photo. Elle a travaillé au tribunal local de ma ville natale, Baturaja, dans le sud de Sumatera, mais elle a pris sa retraite maintenant.
Quand j’étais adolescent, j’étais souvent assis dans le tribunal à attendre et à regarder ma mère travailler. Les affaires judiciaries qu’elle avait concernaient généralement des litiges de limites de champs entre les agriculteurs, mais parfois elle avait aussi des affaires de narcotiques et des meurtes. Je trouvais qu’elle avait l’air courageuse, royale, puissante et qu’elle dégagerait l’autorité quand elle était assise dans le tribunal. Mon père travaillait comme agriculteur de caoutchouc et il travaille encore aujourd’hui. Il a aussi travaillé dans une élevage de crevettes à Java qui appartenait à un demi-frère du president indonésien de l’époque. Il a perdu son emploi quand le dictateur est tombé et que le pays a traversé une crise économique en 1998. Ma mère a toujours eu un salaire plus élevé que mon père, mais cela n’a jamais été un problème pour eux.

“Duelo a jamónes”

FRANCISCO GOYA’S body of work can be viewed as one man’s journey across the enlightenment, from its dawn to its dusk, from the rise of...